Review





Similar Products

98
Miltenyi Biotec cd3 antibody
Cd3 Antibody, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cd3 antibody/product/Miltenyi Biotec
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd3 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Bio X Cell anti cd3 cd28 antibodies
Anti Cd3 Cd28 Antibodies, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cd3 cd28 antibodies/product/Bio X Cell
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cd3 cd28 antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Miltenyi Biotec rea606
Rea606, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rea606/product/Miltenyi Biotec
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rea606 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Elabscience Biotechnology fitc anti mouse cd3
Effect of SL disA therapy on T cells and macrophage from tumor samples (A, B) Flow Cytometry analysis of <t>CD3</t> and CD8 surface markers(A) and CD3 + CD8 + cells statistical graph (B). (C, D) Flow cytometry analysis of CD3 and CD4 surface markers (C) and CD3 + CD4 + cells statistical graph (D). (E, F) Flow cytometry analysis of F4/80 and CD86 surface markers (E) and F4/80 + CD86 + cells statistical graph (F). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 3. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests.
Fitc Anti Mouse Cd3, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fitc anti mouse cd3/product/Elabscience Biotechnology
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fitc anti mouse cd3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Nichirei Corporation source antigen retrieval blocking serum primary antibody anti cd3 413591 rabbit
Effect of SL disA therapy on T cells and macrophage from tumor samples (A, B) Flow Cytometry analysis of <t>CD3</t> and CD8 surface markers(A) and CD3 + CD8 + cells statistical graph (B). (C, D) Flow cytometry analysis of CD3 and CD4 surface markers (C) and CD3 + CD4 + cells statistical graph (D). (E, F) Flow cytometry analysis of F4/80 and CD86 surface markers (E) and F4/80 + CD86 + cells statistical graph (F). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 3. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests.
Source Antigen Retrieval Blocking Serum Primary Antibody Anti Cd3 413591 Rabbit, supplied by Nichirei Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/source antigen retrieval blocking serum primary antibody anti cd3 413591 rabbit/product/Nichirei Corporation
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
source antigen retrieval blocking serum primary antibody anti cd3 413591 rabbit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Miltenyi Biotec cd3 antibody, anti-human
Effect of SL disA therapy on T cells and macrophage from tumor samples (A, B) Flow Cytometry analysis of <t>CD3</t> and CD8 surface markers(A) and CD3 + CD8 + cells statistical graph (B). (C, D) Flow cytometry analysis of CD3 and CD4 surface markers (C) and CD3 + CD4 + cells statistical graph (D). (E, F) Flow cytometry analysis of F4/80 and CD86 surface markers (E) and F4/80 + CD86 + cells statistical graph (F). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 3. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests.
Cd3 Antibody, Anti Human, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cd3 antibody, anti-human/product/Miltenyi Biotec
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd3 antibody, anti-human - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Miltenyi Biotec anti cd4
Effect of SL disA therapy on T cells and macrophage from tumor samples (A, B) Flow Cytometry analysis of <t>CD3</t> and CD8 surface markers(A) and CD3 + CD8 + cells statistical graph (B). (C, D) Flow cytometry analysis of CD3 and CD4 surface markers (C) and CD3 + CD4 + cells statistical graph (D). (E, F) Flow cytometry analysis of F4/80 and CD86 surface markers (E) and F4/80 + CD86 + cells statistical graph (F). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 3. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests.
Anti Cd4, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cd4/product/Miltenyi Biotec
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cd4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Miltenyi Biotec cd8 pe vio770 antibodies
The effects of naïve and Cytomix-stimulated MSCs on T cell proliferation. The gating strategy is shown in . ( A – C ) BM-MSCs, iMSCs WT and iMSCs B2M KO inhibition on the expansion of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and <t>CD3+CD8+</t> T cells via CM. Cytomix enhanced the three types of MSCs’ inhibition on the EI of T cells. ( D – F ) All types of MSCs significantly inhibited the division of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells when co-cultured with PBMCs, in a dose-dependent manner. ( G – I ) All of the MSCs, naïve or Cytomix stimulated, significantly reduced the EI of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ or CD3+CD8+ T cells, at the lowest ratio of MSCs, with iMSCs WT both naïve and Cytomix-stimulated presenting the strongest inhibition. ( J ) Co-culturing all types of MSCs, naïve or Cytomix-stimulated, increased the production of G-CSF in the media, with a dose-dependent effect. ( K ) All types of MSCs significantly decreased the level of IFN-γ at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10, while the three types of naïve MSCs significantly decreased it at 1:50. ( L ) Naïve and Cytomix-stimulated iMSC WTs significantly increased the level of TNF-α at the ratios of 1:50, 1:20 and 1:10, while Cytomix-stimulated iMSC B2M KO significantly increased it at the ratio of 1:50 and 1:20. ( M ) Naïve BM-MSCs significantly increased the level of IL-10 production at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10. Representative results of four independent experiments are shown. Results are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3 in CM; n = 4 in co-culture, each group), and analysed by two-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test to compare naïve vs. Cytomix in each type of MSCs (no significance in all of the settings), or Tukey’s multiple comparisons test to compare different ratios of MSCs to PBMCs in each MSC group, or Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test to compare different MSC groups vs. vehicle in the setting of the same ratio. */**/***/**** represent comparisons of each type of MSC vs. vehicle; #/## represent comparisons of different ratios of each cell type with different levels of p < 0.05/0.01. EI: expansion index; DP: division percentage.
Cd8 Pe Vio770 Antibodies, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cd8 pe vio770 antibodies/product/Miltenyi Biotec
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd8 pe vio770 antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
Miltenyi Biotec pe conjugated anti cd3
The effects of naïve and Cytomix-stimulated MSCs on T cell proliferation. The gating strategy is shown in . ( A – C ) BM-MSCs, iMSCs WT and iMSCs B2M KO inhibition on the expansion of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and <t>CD3+CD8+</t> T cells via CM. Cytomix enhanced the three types of MSCs’ inhibition on the EI of T cells. ( D – F ) All types of MSCs significantly inhibited the division of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells when co-cultured with PBMCs, in a dose-dependent manner. ( G – I ) All of the MSCs, naïve or Cytomix stimulated, significantly reduced the EI of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ or CD3+CD8+ T cells, at the lowest ratio of MSCs, with iMSCs WT both naïve and Cytomix-stimulated presenting the strongest inhibition. ( J ) Co-culturing all types of MSCs, naïve or Cytomix-stimulated, increased the production of G-CSF in the media, with a dose-dependent effect. ( K ) All types of MSCs significantly decreased the level of IFN-γ at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10, while the three types of naïve MSCs significantly decreased it at 1:50. ( L ) Naïve and Cytomix-stimulated iMSC WTs significantly increased the level of TNF-α at the ratios of 1:50, 1:20 and 1:10, while Cytomix-stimulated iMSC B2M KO significantly increased it at the ratio of 1:50 and 1:20. ( M ) Naïve BM-MSCs significantly increased the level of IL-10 production at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10. Representative results of four independent experiments are shown. Results are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3 in CM; n = 4 in co-culture, each group), and analysed by two-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test to compare naïve vs. Cytomix in each type of MSCs (no significance in all of the settings), or Tukey’s multiple comparisons test to compare different ratios of MSCs to PBMCs in each MSC group, or Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test to compare different MSC groups vs. vehicle in the setting of the same ratio. */**/***/**** represent comparisons of each type of MSC vs. vehicle; #/## represent comparisons of different ratios of each cell type with different levels of p < 0.05/0.01. EI: expansion index; DP: division percentage.
Pe Conjugated Anti Cd3, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pe conjugated anti cd3/product/Miltenyi Biotec
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pe conjugated anti cd3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Miltenyi Biotec cd3 apc
Reconstitution of B-cells over time. To characterize B-cell subsets, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies (BD Biosciences) directed against the following antigens: CD45 (V500-C), <t>CD3</t> (APC), CD19 (APC-H7), CD27 (BV421), IgD (PE), CD38 (BV711), CD4 (BV605), and CD8 (PE), as well as 7-AAD (Miltenyi Biotech). The stained cells were then analyzed using multicolor flow cytometry (BD FACS Lyric). The subsets of gated CD19 + cells were identified based on surface marker expression as follows: naïve (CD19+CD27-IgD+), nonswitched memory (CD19+CD27+IgD+), switched memory (CD19+CD27+IgD-), and double negative (CD19+CD27-IgD-); and within the CD19+CD38++ population, we distinguished transitional cells (CD19+CD38++CD27-IgD+), plasmablasts (CD19+CD38++CD27+IgD-), and double-negative CD38 + cells (CD19+CD38++CD27-IgD-). B-cell subsets were expressed as a percentage of the total lymphocyte count. (a) B-cell subpopulations were assessed in 39 patients at baseline and in 36 patients at 3 (M3), 6 (M6), 9 (M9), 12 (M12), and 18 (M18) months following the first rituximab infusion. The 3 patients who did not receive treatment were excluded from the follow-up. Complete depletion of B-cells was observed in all patients at M3 post-rituximab for all B-cell subpopulations. CD19 + cells reappeared 6 months after rituximab infusion. Naive cells re-emerged the most among B-cells, followed by CD38 + cells, transitional cells and finally memory cells. Data are shown as mean values (dots). (b–k) B-cell subpopulations at baseline and at subsequent time points were compared between relapsing patients ( n = 8) and nonrelapsing patients ( n = 19); the 2 patients who received additional anti-CD20 infusions were excluded from subsequent analyses. Data are shown as medians and interquartile range (IQR). P -values were calculated by comparing the median values of each cell subpopulation between relapsing and nonrelapsing patients using a nonparametric, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test.
Cd3 Apc, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cd3 apc/product/Miltenyi Biotec
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd3 apc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Effect of SL disA therapy on T cells and macrophage from tumor samples (A, B) Flow Cytometry analysis of CD3 and CD8 surface markers(A) and CD3 + CD8 + cells statistical graph (B). (C, D) Flow cytometry analysis of CD3 and CD4 surface markers (C) and CD3 + CD4 + cells statistical graph (D). (E, F) Flow cytometry analysis of F4/80 and CD86 surface markers (E) and F4/80 + CD86 + cells statistical graph (F). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 3. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests.

Journal: Molecular Therapy Oncology

Article Title: Engineered Salmonella -mediated c-di-AMP delivery activates STING to remodel the tumor microenvironment

doi: 10.1016/j.omton.2026.201185

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect of SL disA therapy on T cells and macrophage from tumor samples (A, B) Flow Cytometry analysis of CD3 and CD8 surface markers(A) and CD3 + CD8 + cells statistical graph (B). (C, D) Flow cytometry analysis of CD3 and CD4 surface markers (C) and CD3 + CD4 + cells statistical graph (D). (E, F) Flow cytometry analysis of F4/80 and CD86 surface markers (E) and F4/80 + CD86 + cells statistical graph (F). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 3. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests.

Article Snippet: The following antibodies were used: FITC anti-mouse F4/80 (clone CI: A3-1), APC anti-mouse CD86 (clone GL-1), FITC anti-mouse CD3 (clone 17A2), APC anti-mouse CD4 (clone GK1.5), and APC anti-mouse CD8 (clone YTS-169), all purchased from Elabscience Biotechnology Co., Ltd.

Techniques: Flow Cytometry

The effects of naïve and Cytomix-stimulated MSCs on T cell proliferation. The gating strategy is shown in . ( A – C ) BM-MSCs, iMSCs WT and iMSCs B2M KO inhibition on the expansion of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells via CM. Cytomix enhanced the three types of MSCs’ inhibition on the EI of T cells. ( D – F ) All types of MSCs significantly inhibited the division of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells when co-cultured with PBMCs, in a dose-dependent manner. ( G – I ) All of the MSCs, naïve or Cytomix stimulated, significantly reduced the EI of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ or CD3+CD8+ T cells, at the lowest ratio of MSCs, with iMSCs WT both naïve and Cytomix-stimulated presenting the strongest inhibition. ( J ) Co-culturing all types of MSCs, naïve or Cytomix-stimulated, increased the production of G-CSF in the media, with a dose-dependent effect. ( K ) All types of MSCs significantly decreased the level of IFN-γ at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10, while the three types of naïve MSCs significantly decreased it at 1:50. ( L ) Naïve and Cytomix-stimulated iMSC WTs significantly increased the level of TNF-α at the ratios of 1:50, 1:20 and 1:10, while Cytomix-stimulated iMSC B2M KO significantly increased it at the ratio of 1:50 and 1:20. ( M ) Naïve BM-MSCs significantly increased the level of IL-10 production at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10. Representative results of four independent experiments are shown. Results are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3 in CM; n = 4 in co-culture, each group), and analysed by two-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test to compare naïve vs. Cytomix in each type of MSCs (no significance in all of the settings), or Tukey’s multiple comparisons test to compare different ratios of MSCs to PBMCs in each MSC group, or Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test to compare different MSC groups vs. vehicle in the setting of the same ratio. */**/***/**** represent comparisons of each type of MSC vs. vehicle; #/## represent comparisons of different ratios of each cell type with different levels of p < 0.05/0.01. EI: expansion index; DP: division percentage.

Journal: International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Article Title: Proinflammatory Cytokine Preconditioning Enhances the Therapeutic Potency of Different Types of MSCs in Inflammation

doi: 10.3390/ijms27094090

Figure Lengend Snippet: The effects of naïve and Cytomix-stimulated MSCs on T cell proliferation. The gating strategy is shown in . ( A – C ) BM-MSCs, iMSCs WT and iMSCs B2M KO inhibition on the expansion of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells via CM. Cytomix enhanced the three types of MSCs’ inhibition on the EI of T cells. ( D – F ) All types of MSCs significantly inhibited the division of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells when co-cultured with PBMCs, in a dose-dependent manner. ( G – I ) All of the MSCs, naïve or Cytomix stimulated, significantly reduced the EI of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ or CD3+CD8+ T cells, at the lowest ratio of MSCs, with iMSCs WT both naïve and Cytomix-stimulated presenting the strongest inhibition. ( J ) Co-culturing all types of MSCs, naïve or Cytomix-stimulated, increased the production of G-CSF in the media, with a dose-dependent effect. ( K ) All types of MSCs significantly decreased the level of IFN-γ at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10, while the three types of naïve MSCs significantly decreased it at 1:50. ( L ) Naïve and Cytomix-stimulated iMSC WTs significantly increased the level of TNF-α at the ratios of 1:50, 1:20 and 1:10, while Cytomix-stimulated iMSC B2M KO significantly increased it at the ratio of 1:50 and 1:20. ( M ) Naïve BM-MSCs significantly increased the level of IL-10 production at the ratios of 1:20 and 1:10. Representative results of four independent experiments are shown. Results are shown as mean ± SD ( n = 3 in CM; n = 4 in co-culture, each group), and analysed by two-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test to compare naïve vs. Cytomix in each type of MSCs (no significance in all of the settings), or Tukey’s multiple comparisons test to compare different ratios of MSCs to PBMCs in each MSC group, or Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test to compare different MSC groups vs. vehicle in the setting of the same ratio. */**/***/**** represent comparisons of each type of MSC vs. vehicle; #/## represent comparisons of different ratios of each cell type with different levels of p < 0.05/0.01. EI: expansion index; DP: division percentage.

Article Snippet: The PBMCs were stained with anti-human CD3-APC-Vio770, CD4-APC and CD8-PE-Vio770 antibodies (Cat# 130-113-136, 130-113-222, 130-110-680; Miltenyi Biotec) for 30 min on ice in the dark.

Techniques: Inhibition, Cell Culture, Co-Culture Assay

Reconstitution of B-cells over time. To characterize B-cell subsets, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies (BD Biosciences) directed against the following antigens: CD45 (V500-C), CD3 (APC), CD19 (APC-H7), CD27 (BV421), IgD (PE), CD38 (BV711), CD4 (BV605), and CD8 (PE), as well as 7-AAD (Miltenyi Biotech). The stained cells were then analyzed using multicolor flow cytometry (BD FACS Lyric). The subsets of gated CD19 + cells were identified based on surface marker expression as follows: naïve (CD19+CD27-IgD+), nonswitched memory (CD19+CD27+IgD+), switched memory (CD19+CD27+IgD-), and double negative (CD19+CD27-IgD-); and within the CD19+CD38++ population, we distinguished transitional cells (CD19+CD38++CD27-IgD+), plasmablasts (CD19+CD38++CD27+IgD-), and double-negative CD38 + cells (CD19+CD38++CD27-IgD-). B-cell subsets were expressed as a percentage of the total lymphocyte count. (a) B-cell subpopulations were assessed in 39 patients at baseline and in 36 patients at 3 (M3), 6 (M6), 9 (M9), 12 (M12), and 18 (M18) months following the first rituximab infusion. The 3 patients who did not receive treatment were excluded from the follow-up. Complete depletion of B-cells was observed in all patients at M3 post-rituximab for all B-cell subpopulations. CD19 + cells reappeared 6 months after rituximab infusion. Naive cells re-emerged the most among B-cells, followed by CD38 + cells, transitional cells and finally memory cells. Data are shown as mean values (dots). (b–k) B-cell subpopulations at baseline and at subsequent time points were compared between relapsing patients ( n = 8) and nonrelapsing patients ( n = 19); the 2 patients who received additional anti-CD20 infusions were excluded from subsequent analyses. Data are shown as medians and interquartile range (IQR). P -values were calculated by comparing the median values of each cell subpopulation between relapsing and nonrelapsing patients using a nonparametric, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test.

Journal: Kidney International Reports

Article Title: Early-Stage B-cells Predict Relapse After Rituximab Treatment in Patients With Membranous Nephropathy

doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2026.106365

Figure Lengend Snippet: Reconstitution of B-cells over time. To characterize B-cell subsets, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies (BD Biosciences) directed against the following antigens: CD45 (V500-C), CD3 (APC), CD19 (APC-H7), CD27 (BV421), IgD (PE), CD38 (BV711), CD4 (BV605), and CD8 (PE), as well as 7-AAD (Miltenyi Biotech). The stained cells were then analyzed using multicolor flow cytometry (BD FACS Lyric). The subsets of gated CD19 + cells were identified based on surface marker expression as follows: naïve (CD19+CD27-IgD+), nonswitched memory (CD19+CD27+IgD+), switched memory (CD19+CD27+IgD-), and double negative (CD19+CD27-IgD-); and within the CD19+CD38++ population, we distinguished transitional cells (CD19+CD38++CD27-IgD+), plasmablasts (CD19+CD38++CD27+IgD-), and double-negative CD38 + cells (CD19+CD38++CD27-IgD-). B-cell subsets were expressed as a percentage of the total lymphocyte count. (a) B-cell subpopulations were assessed in 39 patients at baseline and in 36 patients at 3 (M3), 6 (M6), 9 (M9), 12 (M12), and 18 (M18) months following the first rituximab infusion. The 3 patients who did not receive treatment were excluded from the follow-up. Complete depletion of B-cells was observed in all patients at M3 post-rituximab for all B-cell subpopulations. CD19 + cells reappeared 6 months after rituximab infusion. Naive cells re-emerged the most among B-cells, followed by CD38 + cells, transitional cells and finally memory cells. Data are shown as mean values (dots). (b–k) B-cell subpopulations at baseline and at subsequent time points were compared between relapsing patients ( n = 8) and nonrelapsing patients ( n = 19); the 2 patients who received additional anti-CD20 infusions were excluded from subsequent analyses. Data are shown as medians and interquartile range (IQR). P -values were calculated by comparing the median values of each cell subpopulation between relapsing and nonrelapsing patients using a nonparametric, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test.

Article Snippet: To characterize B-cell subsets, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies (BD Biosciences) directed against the following antigens: CD45 (V500-C), CD3 (APC), CD19 (APC-H7), CD27 (BV421), IgD (PE), CD38 (BV711), CD4 (BV605), and CD8 (PE), as well as 7-AAD (Miltenyi Biotech).

Techniques: Staining, Bioprocessing, Flow Cytometry, Marker, Expressing, MANN-WHITNEY